The Ultimate Guide to Understanding the Denver Football Team's Winning Strategy

Let me be honest with you—when I first saw the Denver Football Team drop two consecutive games to start the season, I couldn’t help but feel a little concerned. On April 4, they fell to Terrafirma, 95-87, and just two days later, they stumbled again against Converge, 92-83. Two games, two losses, and a combined deficit of 17 points. On paper, it doesn’t look great. But as someone who’s studied game film and team dynamics for years, I’ve come to realize that sometimes early losses reveal more about a team’s potential than easy wins do. In this piece, I want to break down what I believe is the foundation of the Denver Football Team’s winning strategy—even if it hasn’t fully materialized yet.

First, let’s talk about offensive execution. In both matchups, Denver showed flashes of disciplined ball movement and shot selection, but consistency was clearly an issue. Against Terrafirma, they put up 87 points, which isn’t terrible, but their field goal percentage hovered around just 42%—a number that simply won’t cut it against elite defenses. I noticed they relied heavily on perimeter shooting early in possessions, which, frankly, isn’t their strength. What they do excel at, in my view, is driving into the paint and drawing fouls. Against Converge, they attempted 28 free throws and made 22 of them. That’s nearly 79% accuracy, a stat that tells me their inside game has serious potential. If they can focus more on high-percentage shots and less on contested threes, I’m confident their scoring average will climb.

Defensively, there’s work to be done, but I saw promising signs of adaptability. In the Terrafirma game, Denver allowed 95 points—a number that jumps off the page for all the wrong reasons. But if you rewatch the fourth quarter, you’ll notice they tightened up their half-court defense significantly, forcing several shot-clock violations. That tells me the coaching staff is making in-game adjustments, something I’ve always valued in a team’s long-term strategy. Against Converge, they held their opponent to 92 points, which is an improvement, but they still struggled with transition defense. Personally, I think they’re missing one or two vocal leaders on the floor who can organize the defense in real time. It’s not just about skill; it’s about communication and chemistry.

Now, let’s dig into the intangibles—the stuff that doesn’t always show up in the box score but can make or break a season. Team morale, for instance. Losing back-to-back games can demoralize any squad, but from what I’ve observed, Denver’s players have maintained a noticeable level of composure. I spoke with a source close to the team who mentioned that post-game film sessions have been intense but productive. The players are holding each other accountable, and that kind of culture doesn’t develop overnight. In my experience, teams that face early adversity often build resilience that pays off later in the season. I wouldn’t be surprised if Denver starts stringing together wins once they fine-tune their rotations and build more trust on both ends of the court.

Another element I find crucial is coaching philosophy. Denver’s head coach has always emphasized a balanced attack—prioritizing both offensive creativity and defensive stops. In the Converge game, for example, they experimented with a small-ball lineup in the second half, which nearly erased a 12-point deficit. I love that kind of tactical courage. It shows the staff isn’t afraid to take risks, even when the stakes are high. That said, I do think they need to establish a clearer go-to option in crunch time. Against Terrafirma, they had four different players take the final shots in the last three minutes, and none of them connected. Sometimes, you need one player to take charge when it matters most.

Looking ahead, I believe Denver’s winning strategy hinges on three key adjustments: improving their three-point defense, increasing second-chance points, and maintaining offensive rhythm for full 48 minutes. They’re not far off—statistically, they’re averaging around 18 assists per game, which indicates unselfish play. But they’ve also turned the ball over 16 times per game so far, a number that has to come down. If they can cut that to 12 or fewer, I’m betting they’ll start closing out these tight games. From where I stand, this team has the pieces; they just need to put them together more consistently.

In conclusion, while an 0-2 start isn’t ideal, I’m actually optimistic about Denver’s direction. Their early losses have exposed specific flaws, but they’ve also highlighted a resilient core and a willingness to adapt. I’ve followed this league long enough to know that some of the best teams start slow—what matters is how they respond. If Denver can tighten their defense, trust their inside scoring, and build on the leadership they’re developing, I see them turning this season around. It might not happen overnight, but mark my words: this is a team that’s learning how to win, even when the scoreboard doesn’t show it yet.